D V Paluskar – a tribute
D V Paluskar – a tribute
D.V. Paluskar participated in his first Music Conference when he was only 14.
MOHAN D. NADKARNI
The Illustrated Weekly of India, November 27, 1955
The sudden death, at 34, of Dattatraya Vishnu Paluskar is truly a national loss, coming as it did at a time when the older generation of giants in music is gradually dying out. Paluskar was an acknowledged pioneer in the post-Independence renaissance of Indian music and represented the new race of young musicians who were worthy of wearing the mantle of the old masters.
Born at Kurundwad, in Kolhapur district, on May 28, 1921, Paluskar was the only surviving child of the great Vishnu Digambar, an evangelist of Hindustani music who pioneered cultural revival in northern India in the early years of the century. Young Dattatraya received his training from his father, after whose death he continued his lessons under his cousin Chintamanrao Paluskar, Narainrao Vyas, Vinayakrao Patwardhan and Mirashi Bua until 1952.
Already, at the age of 14, Paluskar had made his mark as a musician of promise when, in 1935, he participated for the first time in the Hari Vallabh Music Conference at Jullundur and in the All-India Music Conference at Calcutta. That was the beginning of his rise to fame. Though he had settled down at Poona, he was on the move quite often. Rarely was there a major music festival in which he did not participate. Besides, he broadcast from various stations of All India Radio regularly since 1938.
Inspiration and hard work combined to make him a musical genius. Behind his command of technique and excellence of interpretation lay years of rigorous discipline, unstinted industry and singular determination. Paluskar was one of those rare artistes who combined classicality with popular appeal, and faith in tradition with a progressive outlook.
Paluskar’s big asset was a compelling and resilient voice. He was a khayal singer. His style was simple and clear, and there was no elusive element in it. His vilambits revealed a serene charm of variety and a refined sense of design, while his druts were specimens of tonal grace and rhythmic elegance.
Paluskar was an impressionist with a difference. The characteristic abandon usually associated with an artistic genius of his calibre was not to be found in him. Acrobatics and contortions of any kind were conspicuous by their absence in his performances. Yet his rendering was spectacular. He thrilled his audiences as much by an economy of gestures as by superb presentation; and that pleased his admirers and intrigued his imitators.
Paluskar was always in his elements, whether in a crowded conference or in a friend’s drawing-room. Such was his versatility that even as he finished with a Bageshri or a Mian Ki Malhar, to the delight of his sophisticated audience, he sensed the boredom of his lay listeners, and quietly switched over to a popular devotional song. He had for his pattern such distinguished musician-saints as Tulsidas and Mirabai and, above all, his worthy father, who, in his time, had swayed the masses as much by the devotional fervour of his music as by his saintly personality. The devoutness of temper and the charm of feeling with which Paluskar sang his soul-elevating bhajans were a paternal inheritance that brought him immense fame and popularity. Here was a classicist who sang for the common man.
The excellence of Paluskar’s performance also lay in his achieving a concord between melody and rhythm. He was a master of a variety of rhythms, and many a time the audience would witness a point-to-point race between the vocalist and his accompanist on the tabla.
Paluskar’s style of singing related to the Gwalior School. But he did not rest content with the tradition he inherited from his forbears. With a characteristic catholicity of temper, he undertook countrywide tours in pursuit of other traditions of the country. The result was a happy assimilation in his singing of many different graces of other gayakis that were in accord with the natural quality of his voice and aesthetic individuality.
Paluksar came in contact with many South Indian musicians, and his performances commanded the admiration of southerners. He had the unique distinction of participating in the music festivals of the South. It was during a festival of Karnatic Music in Bombay in January, 1954, that Paluskar rendered a kriti of Thyagaraja in raag Simhendramadhyama in his own inimitable manner, and evoked a ready applause from his discerning audience.
Paluskar recently visited China as a member of the Indian Cultural Delegation. Recounting his impressions of the tour, he said; “Like Indian music, music in China was an ancient tradition. However, Western influence on contemporary Chinese music is very much in evidence today.”
Paluskar visited many important towns and cities in China along with other members of the delegation and found that the Chinese people not only evinced keen interest in our traditional arts but also seemed to appreciate their subtleties and refinements. He himself chose classical and devotional songs for all his performances. His renderings in Bahar and Mian ki Malhar were very popular with the audiences, and on several occasions he was called on to give repeat performances.
An inveterate optimist, Paluskar was highly appreciative of State patronage to the traditional arts in general and to music in particular. While he conceded the modern methods of teaching music, he emphasised that scholastic education in music ought to create opportunities for every promising artiste for the fullest self-expression. The emergence of film music was, in his opinion, a welcome development in so far as it helped to instill an appreciation of music, of whatever quality, among the masses. He however, insisted that films should take to classical modes for their musical fare. His brief excursion into the world of films, as a play-back singer in Baiju Bawra, may be attributed to his desire to show that classical music could well serve the needs of the cinema.
The present writer was a contemporary of Paluskar at school in Poona. If Paluskar’s shy bearing was perplexing to strangers, he endeared himself to his friends by his innate courtesy and ease of conversation in the same way as his art endeared him to his listeners. His sensibility was refined and his judgment generous. There was no callousness or pretence about him and he held contemporary musicians in great esteem.
A man of plain living and clean habits, his recipe for the professionals was regular practice, integrity of character and a practical outlook on life. A devotee of Lord Rama, Paluskar admired Mahatma Gandhi and Vishnu Digambar, his father, whose pictures he always carried with him. To him music was not a mere recreation, but an expression of deep religious faith and devotion, and therefore conducive to peace of mind, if not heavenly bliss.
Paluskar, despite his young age, occupied a place of honour among the great classicists of Hindustani music. Professional tours and his own tender age perhaps afforded him no opportunity to groom disciples after him.
Paluskar is survived by his wife, two children, and his aged mother. His music has been silenced forever, but the great artiste he left behind indelible impressions on the minds of his listeners. His recordings, for the radio and gramophone, are all that we have to cherish as memories of his greatness as an artiste.
|| Without doubt, D.V. Paluskar was an extremely gifted soul and most of my memories date back to 1965 and thereabouts, during my school vacations at Erendawane, Poona – when I was privy to much of his select deliveries on the Gramaphone discs | Perhaps, it was the mellow in his voice, the definitive pitch and tone, or was it a divine meter that was instantly captivating, I am not entirely sure myself | The lyrics was quite another matter altogether | The other reason I am sending this mail is for my appreciation of the writer, Mohan Nadkarni, for his passion in the tribute and his appreciation of music | It takes rare genius for a writer to remain at a dispassionate distance to be able ‘not to take sides’ or ‘not infuse writers knowledge of the artistes work’ and yet present the subtle and fine nuances as though being presented by the musician himself, or as you would receive his renderings, that was the skill that caught my breath for quite a while | At the same time embellishing the article with presenting the world encapsulating the piece as well as providing comfortable position for that particular write-up to sit within the framework so to speak | Great lives indeed ! ||
Great musician Paluskar, Great author Mohanji !